Oct 11, 2012

Allah in the Quran and Scholastic Theology by Prof Dr Mohammad Hashim Kamali

‘Allah’ in the Qur’an and Scholastic Theology

Prof Dr Mohammad Hashim Kamali
Published in: JUST Commentary Vol 10, No.3 March 2010

The extraordinary sensitivity that Malaysian Muslims have manifested over the non-Muslim use of „Allah‟ leaves one in no doubt that theoretical generalities would fail to address the situation we are faced with. It is clear that Malaysia is untypical of much of the rest of Muslim world and the issue we face here is one of its kind in that it touches on acute religious sensitivities one has little choice but to recognize. To address the issue on its own terms is also the correct Islamic advice as conveyed in a legal maxim of Syariah: „Harm must be eliminated’ as a matter of priority. According to another legal maxim “prevention of harm takes priority over the attraction of benefit.” HRH the Sultan of Selangor‟s recent directive to keep „Allah‟ for the use only of Muslims captures the essence of these guidelines. The harm that emanates from acts of violence and destruction of places of worship provided concrete evidence to support that decision.

The word „Allah‟ derives from a contraction of the Arabic definite article al “the” and ilaah “deity, god” to al-laah meaning the “the sole deity, God”. The Qur‟an engages in Allah‟s reality, His various names, His actions, and how He relates to his creatures. Allah is unique, the only Deity, creator of the universe and the whole of humanity, which means that in reference to all monotheists, there should be no restriction to mentioning "Allah‟ in the spirit, however, of remembrance, invocation and doa.

"Allah‟ has made Himself known to mankind by His Excellent Names, al-asma’ al-husna, which are revealed in the Qur‟an and are numbered at 99. That total does not, however, include „Allah‟. This is because Allah is the proper name(ism al-dhaat) of God whereas the asma’ al-husna are all attributes (sifaat). Among the 99 names, the ones most favoured and frequently employed in the Qur‟an are „the Merciful‟ (al-Rahman) and „the Compassionate‟ (al-Rahim). One of the consequences of this numerical specification at 99 is that the believer is discouraged from coining new names and attributes for God. Since the Almighty has described Himself by these attributes, it is through these that we seek knowledge of Him.

Rational theology provides much detail as to how to understand the meaning of these attributes and their relationship with the Self of Allah. The Qur‟an is emphatic on the one hand on the transcendence of Allah- He is utterly beyond the human and no one can define Him. Yet the Qur‟an is also replete with passages wherein the Almighty personifies Himself with human-like descriptions not only by references to His Exalted face, soul, eye, hand, fingers , foot etc., but also that He speaks, listens, answers, loves and hates - and yet despite all this the text says emphatically that “there is nothing like unto Him;” (42: 11) that “sight cannot perceive Him but He encompasses sight and He is the Subtle, the Aware (al-Lateef al-al-Khabeer). These last are two of the asma’ al-husna. Thus no one is able, not even the Prophet Muhammad, to actually see Allah; except perhaps in the Hereafter on Resurrection Day (ru’yat Allah) in the opinion of some theologians. The Prophet has also instructed the faithful to “ponder upon the creation of Allah and not on His Exalted Essence”.

Thus the question arises whether Allah‟s attributes and self description should be understood literally or metaphorically. The latter is discouraged for leading to speculative indulgence, while literal interpretation amounts to anthropomorphism (likening Allah to humans). The prevailing Ash‟ari school of theology holds that we should keep to the literal meaning of Allah‟s attributes and view them in as being in some manner separate or distinct from the divine Essence, but not questioning „how‟ this can be (the doctrine of bi-laa kayf). However the more rationalist Mu‟tazilah school (expired 600 years ago) taught that such a distinction between Allah‟s Essence and His most important attributes (between His dhaat and sifaat) violates the reality of Divine Oneness – That Allah‟s illustrious essence naturally includes His seven most essential (Life, Power, Knowledge etc) without any distinction or separation. So Ash‟arites developed the doctrine of mukhalafah “difference”; everything about Allah is different from all that is known to humans. Thus when we read in the Qur‟an that Allah is „All- Merciful- al-Rahman‟ it cannot mean that He has the human quality of mercy. He has only given Himself that Name and how or why this Name is chosen we cannot know nor should we enquire.

Since human knowledge of the universe is incomplete, knowledge of the Creator of the universe must also be a continuing effort. We are thus encouraged to investigate the world around us, to acquire knowledge of the mysteries of creation, and through it also to increase our understanding of Allah‟s exalted names and attributes.

The Qur‟an is expressive of the manner Allah relates to mankind, which He clearly made the prize of His creation and endowed him with nobility of the highest order: When Allah decides to create, He merely commands to „be and it is‟ as the Qur‟an tells us ( 2:117 ). But in the case of man, Allah created him with His own hands(Q., 38:75), fashioned him in the best of moulds ( 95:4 ), breathed into him of His own illustrious Spirit( 38:72 ), appointed him as His vicegerent in the earth(2:30), taught him the names (and thus essential knowledge and ability to forming concept of) all things(2: 31), and dignified him above the rest of His creation (Q., 17:7). Then Allah, to Him be all praise, asked the angels to prostrate to the archetypal man, Adam, which they did in full submission to the Lord‟s command (7:11). In sum Allah has endowed in man some of His own important attributes on a limited scale and in suitable quantities. Man has been given the capacity and power “and subjected to him (for his use) all that is in the heavens and the earth”(31:20) so as to harness their resources for his own benefit, yet with a sense of responsibility as a trustee and custodian of the earth.

We may invoke any of the Excellent names of Allah in prayer and supplication (Cf., Q, 7:180).It is usual for the worshipper to address the Almighty by that name or attribute which he wishes to appeal to. For example, in praying for pardon, one will address God as either al- ‘Afuw “the forgiving” or al-Tawwab “the receiver of repentance.” Yet of all these, the one name which the Almighty has used most frequently is „Allah‟. This name and its derivatives occur in the Qur‟an (2,697) times, mostly in the singular. For „Allah‟ does not have a plural form. Yet one of its derivatives, ilaah, does occur in both singular and plural (the latter as aalihah). Compare this to al-Rahman, which is the most favoured name, next to „Allah‟ (Q.17:110), but which occurs only (57) times in the text. The Qur‟an does not provide a clear explanation for this preferential use of „Allah‟, but the Prophet, pbuh, has asked the faithful in a hadith to “call upon God by His greatest name (bi-ismih al-a’zam), He will respond to your call, and accept your prayer.” The hadith did not, however, specify the „ism al-a‘zam’ it referred to, and how, if at all, did it differ from the rest of „asma’ al-husna’. But another hadith alludes that the „ism al-a’zam’ occurs in two verses of the Qur‟an ( i.e., 2:163 & 3:2). When we look at these verses, "Allah‟, occurs five times whereas „al-Rahman‟ and „al-Rahim‟ only once each in these short verses with a combined number of only 16 words -then it becomes clear that the ism al-a’zam is none other than "Allah‟.


Professor Mohammad Hashim Kamali is founding chairman and CEO of the International Institute of Advanced Islamic Studies (IAIS) Malaysia. He is also a member of JUST‟s International Advisory Panel

Kamali is the world’s leading expert and author on Islamic law and modern law and comparison between them. He is one of the most prolific producers of quality scholarship on Islam in the world today. Originally from Afghanistan, he is a dean and professor at the International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilization (ISTAC) and the International Islamic University in Malaysia


Of God's many names and the use of 'Allah

‘Allah’ is the Arabic equivalent of ‘God’. And the two words have been used synonymously by all people throughout the history of religion, but there are distinct conditions on its use, writes MOHAMMAD HASHIM KAMALI

Of the 99 beautiful names of God (al-asma' al-husna), three, namely "Allah", "al-Rahman" and "al-Rahim", are most favoured. This is known by all 114 suras of the Quran, except for one, beginning with the typical Islamic phrase, the tasmiyah: Bismillah al-Rahman al-Rahim ("In the name of God, the most compassionate, the most merciful"), a phrase that includes all the three chosen names of God.

Similarly, every Quranic recitation in the five daily prayers begins with the tasmiyah. Of the three names, God has chosen only two, that is, "Allah" and "al-Rahman", by which He may be called.

The reason for the exclusion of "al-Rahim" is probably due to its repetition of the meaning of "al-Rahman". They obtain from the same root, rahima (to be kind, compassionate).

It is reported that the second caliph of Islam, Umar ibn al-Khattab, explained this repetition by saying that "al-Rahman" is meant for Muslims and "al-Rahim" for the rest of mankind.

This understanding endorses the principle that God is universal, omniscient and omnipresent. He is the creator and cherisher of all without exception.

"Allah" is the Arabic equivalent of "God", and the two words have been used synonymously by all people throughout the history of religion.

God has made Himself known to Muslims by His 99 illustrious names, which consist of His attributes that occur throughout the Quran.

The self of God is not known to us; we only know Him by these names and attributes -- such as Ghafoor (forgiving), Wadood (loving), Kareem (noble), Lateef (gracious) and Haleem (perseverant, patient).
When read together, they also set the ethico-cultural optima that Muslims should emulate and manifest in their conduct within the family, in society, and at all times.

Belief in one God, or monotheism, is the central theme of the Islamic principle of tawhid, the oneness of being, which means that there is only one God and essentially also one humanity.

Tawhid permeates every aspect of Islam, in that the presence of God in the universe is the connecting force that binds the whole of the created universe into coherent parts.

Tawhid also implies unity of the human origin in one and the same creator, an article of the Islamic faith implying an innate sense of belonging for all members of the human fraternity.

God, therefore, belongs to the whole of humanity and no sect or section of humanity may deny this sacred link to anyone.

God created Adam and breathed into him of His own spirit and then created from it its pair, and from them a multitude of humans that scatter on the face of the earth.

Those who believe in God are repeatedly asked in the Quran to remember Him often and nurture God-consciousness into themselves through zikir (remembrance), whenever they can.

It should be obvious, then, that in reference to all monotheists, there is no restriction whatsoever regarding the use of the word "Allah" when mentioning Him partakes in the spirit of remembrance, invocation and doa.
This is the basic position of Islam.

However, when Allah is mentioned in a context that amounts to distortion and abuse, if the usage is clear in its abusive import and wording, it may amount to blasphemy, which is an offence.

In the event of more subtle varieties of misuse, that is, when a good use is intended to obtain a bad result, the position may be ascertained under the principle of sadd al-dharai or blocking the (lawful) means for obtaining an unlawful end.

For instance, commerce is lawful by itself but when it is used as a means of usury (riba) or of hoarding and profiteering that inflict harm and distort the normal flow of trade in the marketplace, then the means towards such ends should be blocked.

This can also be said of marriage, which is lawful, but if someone enters into it for quick gratification, to be followed by an abusive divorce, the marriage in question is unlawful, and the authorities are within their rights to prevent it.

This may also be said of the use of "Allah" if the purpose is to convert unsuspecting Muslims, as occurred in some parts of Indonesia, whereby a specious parallel is drawn by Christian missionaries between Islam and Christianity in order to entice Muslims to embrace Christianity.

It is a question to some extent of differentiation between the upright and the deceitful propagation of a doctrine.

If there are equivalent words, such as "Tuhan", but "Allah" is used instead for purposes of proselytisation, then it could well amount to distortion of the kind that violates the sensitivities of the Muslim community as well as taking advantage of the ignorance of its targets.

If Christianity does not accept Islam as a valid religion to begin with, then for Christian missionaries to select only the word "Allah" out of Islam for purposes of proselytisation is tantamount to a misapplication of the term.

Had they recognised Islam as a valid religion, the issue might have begged a different answer. Moreover, the Christian doctrine of Trinity is also founded in an understanding of God that cannot claim acceptance in the Islamic doctrine of tawhid.

Allah's illustrious name may thus be used by all monotheists, Muslims or non-Muslims, for its intended purpose, but if it is used in a way that amounts to distortion and abuse, be it by a Muslim or non-Muslim, it should be obstructed by recourse to the principle of sadd al-dharai.

This principle should not be too liberally applied, however, and confined only to manifest instances of abuse.
The writer is the founding chairman and CEO of the International Institute of Advanced Islamic Studies, Malaysia

The above article was published in New Straits Times on Tuesday, March 10, 2009.
© Copyright 2009 The New Straits Times Press (M) Berhad. All rights reserved

Thanks for coming

Thanks for coming
Terima kasih sudi hadir

Tajuk - Title